HomeBlogMSHA vs OSHA Hearing Conservation: How 30 CFR Part 62 Differs from 1910.95
compliance

MSHA vs OSHA Hearing Conservation: How 30 CFR Part 62 Differs from 1910.95

Matt Reinhold, COO & Co-Founder at SoundtraceMatt ReinholdCOO & Co-Founder10 min readApril 8, 2026
Compliance·MSHA·11 min read·Updated April 2026

Mining employers face a distinct hearing conservation regulatory framework under MSHA 30 CFR Part 62, which differs meaningfully from OSHA 29 CFR 1910.95. The differences in action level, audiometric testing scope, and program requirements mean that a program compliant with one standard is not automatically compliant with the other. According to CDC/NIOSH, approximately 22 million U.S. workers face hazardous occupational noise, and mining workers have among the highest occupational NIHL rates in the country.

Side-by-Side: MSHA 30 CFR Part 62 vs OSHA 1910.95

RequirementOSHA 1910.95MSHA 30 CFR Part 62
Action Level85 dBA TWA — triggers full HCP90 dBA TWA — triggers hearing loss prevention program
Permissible Exposure Level90 dBA TWA (8 hr)90 dBA TWA (same PEL)
Exchange rate5 dB5 dB (same as OSHA)
Audiometric testing scopeOnly workers at or above 85 dBA action levelALL miners must receive baseline audiogram; ongoing testing for exposed miners
Baseline timingWithin 6 months of first exposure above action levelWithin 12 months of starting work at a mine
Annual audiogramWithin 12 months of last audiogram (enrolled workers)Within 12 months for miners exposed at or above 90 dBA action level
STS definition10 dB avg shift at 2000, 3000, 4000 Hz vs baselineSame as OSHA; MSHA uses "significant threshold shift" terminology
HPD requirementAvailable at 85 dBA; mandatory above 90 dBA PEL or after STSRequired at or above 90 dBA action level
CoversGeneral industry, construction; NOT mining operationsAll MSHA-regulated mines (coal and metal/nonmetal, underground and surface)

The Most Important Difference: Universal Audiometric Testing Under MSHA

MSHA 30 CFR Part 62 requires baseline audiometric testing for ALL miners within 12 months of starting at a mine — regardless of their specific noise exposure level. This is significantly broader than OSHA 1910.95, which only requires audiometric testing for workers confirmed at or above 85 dBA TWA. Under MSHA, a miner working in a quiet office area within a mine property must still receive a baseline audiogram. This universal audiometric requirement creates a comprehensive audiometric record for all mining employees from hire, which also provides the strongest possible WC defense foundation.

Jurisdictional Boundary: Which Standard Applies Where

The MSHA/OSHA jurisdictional boundary is operation-specific, not site-specific. At a surface mine or quarry:

  • Mining and extraction operations — MSHA jurisdiction (30 CFR Part 62)
  • Processing plant operations that are not directly part of the mining extraction process — may fall under OSHA 1910.95
  • Office, warehouse, and support facilities on mine property — OSHA jurisdiction in many cases

Employers with operations straddling the MSHA/OSHA boundary must maintain separate, compliant programs for each regulatory framework. See: OSHA vs MSHA hearing conservation: full comparison.

STS Follow-Up Under MSHA

MSHA's significant threshold shift notification and follow-up requirements parallel OSHA's in most respects. When an STS is identified, the miner must be notified in writing and offered the opportunity to be examined by a licensed physician or audiologist. The mining operator must take corrective action including re-evaluation of HPD adequacy. MSHA inspectors check STS follow-up records as a standard component of hearing conservation inspections.

OSHA-compliant hearing conservation — built to protect your workforce and your records

Soundtrace delivers in-house audiometric testing, noise monitoring, and 30-year cloud record retention supervised by a licensed audiologist.

Get a Free Quote Book a demo →
Matt Reinhold, COO & Co-Founder at Soundtrace

Matt Reinhold

COO & Co-Founder, Soundtrace

Matt Reinhold is the COO and Co-Founder of Soundtrace, where he drives strategy and operations to modernize occupational hearing conservation. With deep expertise in workplace safety technology, Matt stays at the forefront of regulatory developments, audiometric testing innovation, and noise exposure management — helping employers build smarter, more compliant hearing conservation programs.

Related Articles

Stay in the loop

Get compliance updates, product news, and practical tips delivered to your inbox.