HomeBlogMSHA Noise Standard for Mining: How 30 CFR Part 62 Differs from OSHA 1910.95
MSHA Compliance

MSHA Noise Standard for Mining: How 30 CFR Part 62 Differs from OSHA 1910.95

Matt Reinhold, COO & Co-Founder at SoundtraceMatt ReinholdCOO & Co-Founder10 min readApril 8, 2026
MSHA·Mining·10 min read·Updated April 2026

Mining operations face noise-related regulatory requirements from the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) rather than OSHA for most activities. MSHA’s noise standard — 30 CFR Part 62 — has similarities to OSHA 29 CFR 1910.95 but differs in key provisions. Mining employers, contractors at mine sites, and service providers operating in MSHA-regulated environments need to understand which standard applies to their workers and how the requirements differ. According to CDC/NIOSH, mining workers have among the highest rates of occupational NIHL of any sector, with surface and underground mining both generating significant noise exposure from drilling, blasting, crushing, and hauling.

MSHA vs. OSHA: The Key Differences

RequirementMSHA 30 CFR Part 62OSHA 29 CFR 1910.95
Action level (TWA)90 dBA85 dBA
Permissible Exposure Limit90 dBA90 dBA
Exchange rate5 dB5 dB
Baseline audiogram timingWithin 12 months of first exposureWithin 6 months (or 12 months with mobile van)
Annual audiogram requirementYes, for miners at or above action levelYes, for workers at or above action level
Professional reviewPhysician or audiologist requiredPhysician or audiologist required
Hearing protector requirementRequired when exposure above PELRequired when worker at action level and not enrolled in HCP
MSHA Action Level Is Less Protective

MSHA’s action level of 90 dBA TWA is 5 dB higher than OSHA’s 85 dBA. This means miners can be exposed at 85–89 dBA TWA without triggering MSHA’s mandatory audiometric testing and hearing protector requirements. At these levels, NIOSH considers workers at significant NIHL risk over a career. Mining companies that align their programs to NIOSH criteria (85 dBA TWA) rather than just MSHA minimums provide meaningfully better worker protection and generate stronger WC defense records.

Contractor Jurisdiction at Mine Sites

Contract employees who work regularly at MSHA-regulated mine sites are typically covered by MSHA jurisdiction during their mine site work, not OSHA. This includes maintenance contractors, equipment operators, delivery personnel with regular site access, and service providers. Contractors whose employees work at both mine sites and non-mine facilities may have dual compliance obligations and should confirm jurisdictional coverage for each work context.

Best Practice: Design to NIOSH Criteria

Whether your operation is MSHA or OSHA regulated, designing the hearing conservation program to NIOSH’s REL criteria (85 dBA TWA, 3 dB exchange rate) produces better worker protection outcomes and stronger documentation for WC defense. A program designed to NIOSH criteria will always meet both MSHA and OSHA minimum requirements, since NIOSH is more protective.


Frequently Asked Questions

What is MSHA 30 CFR Part 62 and how does it differ from OSHA 1910.95?
MSHA 30 CFR Part 62 applies to metal, nonmetal, and coal mines instead of OSHA 1910.95. Key differences: MSHA’s action level is 90 dBA (vs. OSHA’s 85 dBA), baseline audiogram timing is within 12 months, and both use 5 dB exchange rates.
Which workers fall under MSHA rather than OSHA?
MSHA covers miners and mine operators at metal, nonmetal, and coal mines, including surface and underground operations. Contract employees working at mine sites are typically covered by MSHA for the duration of their mine site work.
What are MSHA 30 CFR Part 62 audiometric testing requirements?
Baseline audiograms within 12 months of first exposure to the 90 dBA action level, annual audiograms thereafter, ANSI S3.6-compliant audiometers, and physician or audiologist review of all results. Requirements closely parallel OSHA 1910.95 with the noted action level difference.

ANSI-Compliant Audiometric Testing for MSHA and OSHA Programs

Soundtrace automated audiometric testing meets ANSI S3.6 and S3.1-1999 standards required by both MSHA 30 CFR Part 62 and OSHA 29 CFR 1910.95 — with licensed audiologist Professional Supervisor review of all results.

Get a Free Quote
Matt Reinhold, COO & Co-Founder at Soundtrace

Matt Reinhold

COO & Co-Founder, Soundtrace

Matt Reinhold is the COO and Co-Founder of Soundtrace, where he drives strategy and operations to modernize occupational hearing conservation. With deep expertise in workplace safety technology, Matt stays at the forefront of regulatory developments, audiometric testing innovation, and noise exposure management — helping employers build smarter, more compliant hearing conservation programs.

Related Articles

Stay in the loop

Get compliance updates, product news, and practical tips delivered to your inbox.