HomeBlogMicroprocessor Audiometer vs. Manual Audiometry: OSHA's Demonstrated Competence Standard
audiometry

Microprocessor Audiometer vs. Manual Audiometry: OSHA's Demonstrated Competence Standard

Matt Reinhold, COO & Co-Founder at SoundtraceMatt ReinholdCOO & Co-Founder12 min readApril 1, 2026
Audiometric Technology·OSHA Compliance·12 min read·Updated April 2026

Microprocessor audiometers have fundamentally changed the scalability of occupational audiometric testing. Unlike manual audiometry requiring a licensed clinician at the controls of every test, automated microprocessor audiometers present tones, track responses, and determine thresholds systematically — enabling audiometric testing at the employer’s facility without per-test clinician involvement. OSHA 29 CFR 1910.95 accepts microprocessor audiometry when the audiometer meets ANSI S3.6 standards and results are reviewed by a professional supervisor. According to CDC/NIOSH, approximately 22 million U.S. workers require annual occupational audiometric surveillance.

Microprocessor vs. Manual Audiometry: Key Differences

CharacteristicMicroprocessor AudiometryManual Audiometry
Tone presentationAutomated per programmed protocolClinician-controlled
Threshold determinationAutomated by algorithmClinician judgment
Test administrationWorker interacts with audiometer directlyClinician present during test
ScalabilityHigh — no per-test clinician involvementLimited by clinician availability
ANSI S3.6 complianceYes, if audiometer is properly calibratedYes, if audiometer is properly calibrated
Professional SupervisorRequired to review resultsRequired to review results (may be the clinician)
OSHA acceptabilityYes, with ANSI S3.6 compliant audiometerYes
The Professional Supervisor Requirement Does Not Go Away

Automated microprocessor audiometry eliminates the need for a clinician to be present during each test, but it does not eliminate the Professional Supervisor requirement. A licensed audiologist or physician must review every audiometric result, make STS determinations, and authorize any required follow-up actions. Microprocessor audiometry automates the test administration workflow; the Professional Supervisor handles the clinical interpretation workflow. Both are required for OSHA compliance.

Soundtrace Type 4 Microprocessor Audiometer

Soundtrace uses a Type 4 automated microprocessor audiometer meeting ANSI S3.6 calibration and performance standards. Workers perform the test by responding to automated tone presentations through a simple response interface. Results are immediately transmitted to Soundtrace’s SOC 2 certified, HIPAA-compliant cloud platform for review by Dr. Rivka Strom, Soundtrace’s licensed Supervising Audiologist, or another qualified Professional Supervisor. All STS determinations, age correction applications, and required follow-up documentation are handled by the Professional Supervisor.

Test Environment Requirements Apply Regardless of Audiometer Type

The ANSI S3.1-1999 maximum permissible ambient noise level requirements for audiometric test environments apply to microprocessor audiometric testing the same as to manual audiometric testing. An automated audiometer deployed in a test room that does not meet ANSI S3.1-1999 MPANLs produces invalid results regardless of the audiometer’s ANSI S3.6 calibration status. The October 11, 2022 OSHA letter of interpretation confirms that ANSI S3.1-1999 (R2018) MPANLs satisfy OSHA Appendix D requirements.


Frequently Asked Questions

What is a microprocessor audiometer and how does it differ from manual audiometry?
A microprocessor audiometer automatically presents pure tones and determines thresholds without requiring a clinician to control each tone presentation. Manual audiometry requires a licensed clinician at the controls. Both can meet ANSI S3.6 standards; microprocessor audiometers enable consistent, scalable occupational screening without per-test clinician involvement.
Does OSHA 1910.95 require manual audiometry or is automated testing acceptable?
OSHA 1910.95 requires audiometers meeting ANSI S3.6 standards and Professional Supervisor review of results. The standard does not require manual audiometry. Automated microprocessor audiometers meeting ANSI S3.6 are acceptable. Professional Supervisor review is required regardless of test method.
What OSHA documentation must be maintained for microprocessor audiometric testing?
Audiometer calibration records (annual electroacoustic and daily biologic check), test environment ANSI S3.1-1999 compliance documentation, individual audiometric records for each worker, and professional supervisor review documentation showing STS determinations and follow-up actions.

ANSI S3.6-Compliant Automated Audiometry at Employer Facilities

Soundtrace Type 4 microprocessor audiometry deploys at your facility — ANSI S3.6 calibrated, ANSI S3.1-1999 environment compliant, with licensed audiologist Professional Supervisor review of every result.

Get a Free Quote
Matt Reinhold, COO & Co-Founder at Soundtrace

Matt Reinhold

COO & Co-Founder, Soundtrace

Matt Reinhold is the COO and Co-Founder of Soundtrace, where he drives strategy and operations to modernize occupational hearing conservation. With deep expertise in workplace safety technology, Matt stays at the forefront of regulatory developments, audiometric testing innovation, and noise exposure management — helping employers build smarter, more compliant hearing conservation programs.

Related Articles

Stay in the loop

Get compliance updates, product news, and practical tips delivered to your inbox.