How-To Guides
How-To Guides
March 17, 2023

Microprocessor Audiometers and OSHA's Demonstrated Competence Standard: What Employers Need to Know

Share article

Audiometric Testing·OSHA Compliance·11 min read·Updated March 2026

One of the most commonly misunderstood provisions in OSHA’s hearing conservation standard is who is permitted to conduct audiometric testing. Many employers and safety professionals assume that audiometric testing requires a CAOHC-certified occupational hearing conservationist (OHC). This is not correct — and the distinction matters significantly for how employers structure their audiometric testing programs. OSHA 1910.95(g)(3) creates two separate pathways depending on the type of audiometer used, and for microprocessor audiometers, it explicitly replaces the certification requirement with a “demonstrated competence” standard.

Soundtrace satisfies OSHA’s demonstrated competence standard through its own documented training program for its cloud-connected microprocessor audiometer, with Dr. Subinoy Das serving as the licensed audiologist professional supervisor for the program.

1910.95(g)(3)
The OSHA provision that creates the demonstrated competence pathway for microprocessor audiometry
Not Required
CAOHC certification is not required for microprocessor audiometer operators under OSHA 1910.95
PS Required
A licensed audiologist or physician professional supervisor is required regardless of audiometer type
The Regulatory Text

29 CFR 1910.95(g)(3): Audiometric tests shall be performed by a licensed or certified audiologist, otolaryngologist, or other physician, or by a technician who is certified by the Council for Accreditation in Occupational Hearing Conservation, or by a technician who satisfactorily demonstrates competence in administering audiometric examinations — with that second category applying when microprocessor audiometers are used.

The Two Technician Pathways Under 1910.95(g)(3)

OSHA’s audiometric testing personnel requirements at 1910.95(g)(3) create a tiered structure based on the type of audiometer used:

Audiometer TypePermitted TechnicianCredential Required
Manual audiometerLicensed/certified audiologist, otolaryngologist, or physicianState licensure or board certification required
Manual audiometerTechnicianCAOHC certification (COHC) required
Microprocessor audiometerLicensed/certified audiologist, otolaryngologist, or physicianState licensure or board certification required
Microprocessor audiometerTechnicianDemonstrated competence only — CAOHC not required

The distinction exists because a microprocessor audiometer automates the judgment-intensive portions of the test. In manual audiometry, the technician makes real-time decisions about tone presentation, threshold bracketing, and response validity. These decisions require the clinical training that CAOHC certification is designed to provide. In microprocessor audiometry, the equipment handles these functions automatically — reducing the technician’s role to patient instruction, equipment setup, flagging obvious problems, and escalating to the professional supervisor when needed.

What a Microprocessor Audiometer Is Under OSHA 1910.95

OSHA’s use of the term “microprocessor audiometer” in 1910.95(g)(3) refers to self-calibrating, self-recording audiometers that automate the test presentation and threshold-determination process. Key features that characterize a microprocessor audiometer for OSHA purposes:

  • Automated tone presentation: The audiometer determines the order, level, and timing of tone presentations algorithmically, without requiring the technician to manually advance through frequencies.
  • Automated threshold determination: The device calculates hearing thresholds based on patient response patterns, using a defined algorithm rather than technician judgment.
  • Self-recording: Test results are automatically stored electronically, creating a record without manual data entry by the technician.
  • Self-calibrating or regularly calibrated: The device performs or facilitates calibration verification to confirm accurate tone levels.

Cloud-connected audiometric platforms like Soundtrace’s Type 4 microprocessor audiometer meet this definition. The device presents tones, tracks responses, calculates thresholds, and transmits results to the cloud portal without requiring the test administrator to manually control each step. This is what enables the demonstrated competence pathway.

What Demonstrated Competence Means — and How to Document It

OSHA does not define “demonstrated competence” with a specific curriculum, minimum hours, or examination requirement. This is intentional — the standard recognizes that microprocessor audiometer operation is equipment-specific, and that what constitutes competence will vary depending on the complexity and design of the specific device used.

In practice, demonstrated competence for microprocessor audiometer operation encompasses the ability to:

  • Set up and operate the specific audiometric equipment correctly
  • Provide clear, accurate test instructions to the employee being tested
  • Recognize when a test result appears invalid or inconsistent and know to flag it for PS review rather than accept it
  • Perform or verify daily calibration checks and recognize when calibration has failed
  • Maintain appropriate test conditions (quiet environment, proper earphone placement)
  • Understand when to refer an employee to the PS for clinical review

What demonstrated competence does not require is the ability to interpret audiometric results clinically — to determine STS, evaluate work-relatedness, or make referral decisions. Those functions belong to the professional supervisor.

Documentation Is the Compliance Record

Because there is no third-party certification to point to, the employer’s documentation of demonstrated competence is the compliance record. This should include: a description of the training provided, the equipment covered, the date and duration of training, and a record of who completed it. Training provided by the audiometric testing vendor — and documented in the vendor’s program materials — satisfies this requirement when it covers the competency elements above.

The Professional Supervisor’s Role in a Microprocessor Audiometry Program

OSHA 1910.95(g)(3) requires that the audiometric testing program be “supervised or reviewed” by a licensed or certified audiologist, otolaryngologist, or other physician — regardless of whether a microprocessor or manual audiometer is used. This is the professional supervisor (PS) requirement, and it is not waived by the use of a microprocessor audiometer or the demonstrated competence pathway.

The PS’s responsibilities in a microprocessor audiometry program include:

  • Reviewing audiograms to identify STSs and other clinically significant findings
  • Making work-relatedness determinations for cases that approach the OSHA 300 Log recordability threshold
  • Providing clinical interpretation when audiometric patterns are ambiguous or suggest non-occupational conditions
  • Issuing referrals to employees whose audiograms indicate a need for further evaluation
  • Reviewing program-level data and providing guidance on program effectiveness
  • Being available for consultation when the technician encounters an issue beyond their competence

The PS does not need to be present at each individual test session. In a cloud-based audiometric program, the PS reviews results remotely through the program’s portal as audiograms are completed and transmitted. This is the model that makes nationwide audiometric programs scalable without requiring a credentialed audiologist at every testing location.

State Plan Exceptions: Oregon, Washington, and Texas

Several state plan states have adopted requirements that go beyond federal OSHA 1910.95 with respect to audiometric technician qualifications:

StateAdditional RequirementNotes
OregonCAOHC certification required for technicians regardless of audiometer typeOR-OSHA has not adopted the federal demonstrated competence exception for microprocessor audiometers
WashingtonCAOHC certification required for technicians regardless of audiometer typeWAC 296-817 requires COHC certification; the federal microprocessor exception does not apply
TexasAudiometric technician registration required for private employersSeparate from CAOHC; applies under state health department rules, not OSHA jurisdiction

Federal workplaces located within Oregon and Washington are governed by federal OSHA, not OR-OSHA or WISHA, and therefore the federal demonstrated competence pathway applies to them regardless of state plan requirements. Private employers in these states must comply with their state plan requirements, which means CAOHC certification is effectively required for technicians regardless of the audiometer type used.

CAOHC Certification vs. Demonstrated Competence: Practical Differences

For employers evaluating audiometric testing vendors, the distinction matters practically:

  • CAOHC certification requires completing an approved course (typically 20 hours), passing an examination, and maintaining certification through continuing education every 5 years. It is transferable across employers and audiometer types (within the manual pathway).
  • Demonstrated competence is equipment-specific and program-specific. Training provided for one microprocessor platform does not automatically satisfy demonstrated competence for a different platform. The documentation of what was trained, on what equipment, is the compliance record.

Neither is inherently superior from a compliance standpoint for the microprocessor pathway — a vendor whose technicians have CAOHC certification and use microprocessor audiometers is compliant, as is a vendor whose technicians have demonstrated competence through documented training on their specific equipment. The key is that one or the other applies, the documentation exists, and the PS oversight requirement is met regardless.

How the Soundtrace Compliance Model Works

Soundtrace’s audiometric testing program operates under the demonstrated competence pathway of 1910.95(g)(3). The program uses a cloud-connected Type 4 microprocessor audiometer — a self-calibrating, self-recording device that automates tone presentation and threshold determination. Client facility staff who administer tests complete Soundtrace’s documented training program, which covers equipment operation, patient instruction, daily calibration verification, recognition of invalid results, and escalation procedures.

Dr. Subinoy Das, a licensed audiologist, serves as the Professional Supervisor for Soundtrace’s hearing conservation programs. All audiograms are transmitted to the Soundtrace cloud portal, where they are reviewed by the PS team. STS determinations, work-relatedness evaluations, and referral decisions are made by licensed audiology staff through the portal — not by the on-site test administrator. This division of responsibilities — demonstrated competence for equipment operation, licensed professional oversight for clinical judgment — is exactly the model OSHA’s 1910.95(g)(3) structure is designed to support.

▶ Bottom line: The CAOHC requirement applies to manual audiometry technicians. For microprocessor audiometers, demonstrated competence — documented by the testing program — is the OSHA standard. The PS oversight requirement applies regardless of which pathway is used.


Frequently asked questions

Does OSHA require CAOHC certification for audiometric technicians?
Only for manual audiometry technicians. For technicians operating microprocessor audiometers, OSHA 1910.95(g)(3) requires demonstrated competence rather than CAOHC certification. However, Oregon and Washington (state plan states) require CAOHC certification regardless of audiometer type for employers under state OSHA jurisdiction.
What makes an audiometer a “microprocessor audiometer” under OSHA?
A microprocessor audiometer is a self-calibrating, self-recording device that automates tone presentation and threshold determination. The automation of these judgment-intensive functions is what justifies OSHA’s lower technician qualification threshold for this type of equipment.
How does an employer document demonstrated competence?
Through training records that describe: the training provided, the equipment covered, the competency elements addressed, the date, and who completed it. Training provided by the audiometric testing vendor is typically the primary documentation source. There is no required format or minimum hours — the documentation must show the technician is competent to operate the specific equipment used.
Is a professional supervisor still required if a microprocessor audiometer is used?
Yes. OSHA 1910.95(g)(3) requires PS oversight regardless of audiometer type. The PS must be a licensed audiologist or physician and is responsible for reviewing audiograms, making STS and work-relatedness determinations, and providing clinical oversight. The demonstrated competence pathway only affects the technician credential — not the PS requirement.
Does the demonstrated competence exception apply in Oregon and Washington?
No, for private employers. OR-OSHA and Washington’s WISHA require CAOHC certification regardless of audiometer type. Federal workplaces in these states are under federal OSHA jurisdiction and may use the demonstrated competence pathway. Private employers in Oregon and Washington must follow their state plan requirements.

Microprocessor Audiometry with PS Review Built In

Soundtrace’s cloud-connected platform satisfies OSHA’s demonstrated competence standard through documented training, with a licensed audiologist professional supervisor reviewing every audiogram through the cloud portal.

Get a Free Quote