This page indexes every Canadian provincial and territorial hearing conservation employer guide on Soundtrace — all 10 provinces and 3 territories, plus the federal COHSR rule for comparison. Use the matrix below to compare action level, exposure limit, exchange rate, and audiometric testing posture across jurisdictions, then click through to the full guide for the province or territory you operate in. For the long-form pillar that explains the structural differences between US OSHA 1910.95 and the Canadian system, see Canada vs. Federal OSHA Hearing Conservation.
Soundtrace provides audiometric testing and noise monitoring tooling that aligns with CSA Z94.2, CSA Z107.56, and CSA Z1007 for Canadian operations — and with ANSI S3.1 / OSHA 1910.95 for US operations. One platform, both sides of the border.
Comparison Matrix — All 13 Jurisdictions
The following matrix mirrors the per-jurisdiction data in the Canada pillar, with each jurisdiction name linking to its full Soundtrace guide. Action levels and exposure limits are given in dBA Lex,8 unless noted. Audiometric testing posture: M = mandatory by regulation; R = required where reasonably practicable / recommended; SBP = standard of best practice via CSA Z1007.
| Jurisdiction | Regulation | Action Level | Exposure Limit | Exchange Rate | Audiometric Testing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alberta | OHS Code Part 16 (Noise) | 85 dBA | 85 dBA Lex,8 | 3 dB | M (baseline within 6 mo, every 2 yrs) |
| British Columbia | OHSR Part 7.1–7.8 | 82 dBA (assessment) | 85 dBA Lex,8 | 3 dB | M (baseline + annual at ≥ 85 dBA) |
| Manitoba | WSH Reg 217/2006 Part 12 | 80 dBA (assessment) | 85 dBA Lex,8 | 3 dB | M (every 2 yrs at ≥ 80 dBA) |
| New Brunswick | Reg. 91-191 under OHS Act | 85 dBA | 85 dBA Lex,8 | 3 dB | R (HCP at ≥ 85 dBA) |
| Newfoundland & Labrador | OHS Regulations 2012 Part VI | 85 dBA | 85 dBA Lex,8 | 3 dB | R (recommended) |
| Northwest Territories | NWT OHS Regulations Part 7 | 85 dBA | 85 dBA Lex,8 | 3 dB | R (HCP at ≥ 85 dBA) |
| Nova Scotia | N.S. Reg. 99/2001 | 85 dBA | 85 dBA Lex,8 | 3 dB | R (where reasonably practicable) |
| Nunavut | Nunavut OHS Regulations Part 7 | 85 dBA | 85 dBA Lex,8 | 3 dB | R (HCP at ≥ 85 dBA) |
| Ontario | O. Reg. 381/15 (Noise) | 85 dBA | 85 dBA Lex,8 | 3 dB | R (CSA Z1007 as best practice) |
| Prince Edward Island | OHS Act General Regs Part 45 | 85 dBA | 85 dBA Lex,8 | 3 dB | R (where reasonably practicable) |
| Quebec | RSST ss. 130–141 (2023) | 85 dBA | 85 dBA Lex,8 | 3 dB (post-2023) | M (CNESST surveillance) |
| Saskatchewan | OHS Regulations 2020 Part VIII | 85 dBA | 85 dBA Lex,8 | 3 dB | R / M (program-mandated at ≥ 85 dBA) |
| Yukon | OHS Regulations Part 6 | 85 dBA | 85 dBA Lex,8 | 3 dB | R (recommended) |
| Federal (COHSR) — for comparison | SOR/86-304 Part VII ss. 7.1–7.8 | 84 dBA | 87 dBA | 3 dB | SBP (CSA Z1007) |
HPD selection across every Canadian jurisdiction defers to CSA Z94.2; noise measurement defers to CSA Z107.56; program management defers to CSA Z1007. The three CSA standards run through every row in the matrix above — what changes from province to province is the regulatory trigger, the audiometric mandate, and the penalty structure (covered in each per-jurisdiction guide).
Guides Grouped by Region
If you operate in a specific part of the country, the jurisdictional guides relevant to you typically cluster geographically:
| Region | Guides |
|---|---|
| Atlantic Canada | Nova Scotia · New Brunswick · Newfoundland & Labrador · Prince Edward Island |
| Central Canada | Ontario · Quebec |
| Prairie Provinces | Manitoba · Saskatchewan · Alberta |
| West Coast | British Columbia |
| Northern Canada | Yukon · Northwest Territories · Nunavut |
| Federally regulated (interprovincial transport, banking, telecom, federal Crown corps, on-reserve First Nations employers) | Canada vs. Federal OSHA pillar (COHSR Part VII) |
Sorted by Exchange Rate
The exchange rate determines how quickly the noise dose accumulates as exposure rises. A 3 dB exchange rate (equal-energy) doubles the dose for every 3 dB increase — the same convention used by NIOSH and ISO 1999. A 5 dB exchange rate (US OSHA) is less protective. Every Canadian jurisdiction now uses 3 dB:
- 3 dB exchange rate (all 13 provincial / territorial jurisdictions and federal COHSR): Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Newfoundland & Labrador, Northwest Territories, Nova Scotia, Nunavut, Ontario, Prince Edward Island, Quebec (since 2023), Saskatchewan, Yukon.
- 5 dB exchange rate: none, in Canada. The closest comparator is US Federal OSHA 1910.95 — covered in the Canada vs. Federal OSHA pillar.
Quebec was previously the lone Canadian holdout on a 5 dB exchange rate (and a 90 dBA exposure limit). The 2023 amendments to the RSST aligned Quebec with the rest of Canada at 85 dBA Lex,8 and 3 dB, with a transition period through 2024. As of 2026 the new criteria are in full force. See the Quebec guide for details.
Sorted by Audiometric Testing Posture
Whether audiometric testing is explicitly mandated by regulation — versus required as a program element or recommended where reasonably practicable — varies more than the exposure criteria. This is the dimension most likely to surprise US employers expanding into Canada.
- Mandatory by regulation (M): British Columbia (baseline + annual at ≥ 85 dBA), Alberta (baseline within 6 months, then every 2 years), Manitoba (every 2 years at ≥ 80 dBA), Quebec (CNESST surveillance program).
- Required as part of the HCP / where reasonably practicable (R): Ontario, Saskatchewan, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Newfoundland & Labrador, Prince Edward Island, Yukon, Northwest Territories, Nunavut.
- Standard of best practice via CSA Z1007 (SBP): federally regulated workplaces under COHSR Part VII — audiometric surveillance is not in the regulation itself but flows from CSA Z1007 and the general duty of care under Canada Labour Code Part II s. 124.
How to Use This Index
- Identify the regulator. First decide whether the workplace is federally regulated (interprovincial transport, banking, telecom, federal Crown corp, on-reserve First Nations employer — about 6% of the workforce) or provincially regulated (everyone else). Federally regulated workplaces follow COHSR Part VII; provincially regulated workplaces follow the rule for the province or territory in which the work is performed.
- Open the per-jurisdiction guide. Each guide on this page covers the regulator, governing statute, noise regulation citation, action level, exposure limit, exchange rate, audiometric testing requirements, HPD and measurement standards, key noise-exposed industries, and penalty ranges (in CAD) for that specific province or territory.
- Build the program against the highest applicable standard. Multi-jurisdiction employers (a trucking company crossing provincial lines, a national manufacturer with sites in several provinces) should build one hearing conservation program against the most protective combination of requirements — typically BC’s 82 dBA assessment trigger, Manitoba’s 80 dBA monitoring trigger, and an annual audiometric cadence — rather than maintaining a separate compliance posture per site.
Need an HCP that works across Canadian jurisdictions?
Soundtrace builds hearing conservation documentation and audiometric records that satisfy the strictest Canadian provincial requirements while remaining compatible with US OSHA 1910.95 — one program, one platform, with 30-year cloud record retention and audiometry supervised by a licensed audiologist.
Get a Free Quote Book a demo →- Canada vs. Federal OSHA Hearing Conservation: Employer Guide to COHSR, Provincial OH&S, and CSA Standards (the long-form pillar)
- Federal OSHA vs. State Plan OSHA Hearing Conservation (US analog — how the state-plan system compares)
- OSHA vs. NIOSH: The 5 dB vs. 3 dB Exchange Rate Explained
- OSHA 1910.95 Hearing Conservation: The Complete Guide
