HomeBlogUltrasound in the Workplace: Noise Hazards, OSHA Coverage, and Hearing Protection
compliance

Ultrasound in the Workplace: Noise Hazards, OSHA Coverage, and Hearing Protection

Matt Reinhold, COO & Co-Founder at SoundtraceMatt ReinholdCOO & Co-Founder10 min readApril 1, 2026
Noise Exposure·Ultrasound·10 min read·Updated April 2026

Occupational ultrasound exposure — from ultrasonic welders, cleaners, and cutting equipment — presents a hearing hazard that falls partly within and partly outside OSHA 29 CFR 1910.95’s coverage. Ultrasonic equipment generates both high-frequency ultrasonic energy above audible range and sub-harmonic noise components within the audible range. The sub-harmonic components are covered by OSHA 1910.95’s noise standard; the ultrasonic components are addressed through the General Duty Clause and NIOSH guidance. For employers in automotive manufacturing, electronics, and food processing, understanding this coverage split is essential for building a complete occupational hearing protection program.

Ultrasound Exposure Sources and Industries

Equipment / ProcessIndustryFrequency RangeCoverage
Ultrasonic weldersAutomotive, electronics, plastics20–40 kHz primary; sub-harmonics 10–20 kHzSub-harmonics: OSHA 1910.95; ultrasonic: General Duty Clause
Ultrasonic cleanersElectronics, medical devices, manufacturing20–60 kHz primary; sub-harmonics audibleSub-harmonics: OSHA 1910.95; ultrasonic: General Duty Clause
Ultrasonic cutting/homogenizationFood processing, pharmaceuticals20–40 kHzSub-harmonics: OSHA 1910.95
Ultrasonic flow meters and sensorsMultiple industries40 kHz and aboveGenerally low intensity; assess case by case
Sub-Harmonic Noise Is the Primary Auditory Hazard

Ultrasonic welders and cleaners operating at 20–40 kHz generate sub-harmonic noise at half and one-quarter their fundamental frequency — placing significant energy at 10–20 kHz, which is within the audible range. Workers adjacent to ultrasonic welders often face TWAs from sub-harmonic noise that exceed the 85 dBA action level under OSHA 1910.95, even though the equipment is classified as ultrasonic. Standard octave-band noise monitoring captures these components.

NIOSH Guidance for Ultrasound

NIOSH recommends limiting airborne ultrasound exposure based on 1/3-octave band levels, with limits tightening at higher frequencies. NIOSH also recommends audiometric surveillance for workers with sustained ultrasound exposure, recognizing that sub-harmonic and airborne ultrasonic exposures can cause hearing effects including temporary and permanent threshold shifts, tinnitus, and vestibular effects at sufficient intensities.

Practical Compliance Approach

For employers with ultrasonic welders or cleaners: (1) conduct octave-band noise monitoring at worker positions to characterize sub-harmonic components in the audible range, (2) if audible-range TWA reaches 85 dBA, enroll workers in OSHA 1910.95 HCP, (3) additionally assess ultrasonic-range exposure per NIOSH guidance, (4) ensure HPDs selected for workers near ultrasonic equipment provide attenuation across both audible sub-harmonics and, where practicable, the lower ultrasonic range.


Frequently Asked Questions

Does OSHA 1910.95 apply to ultrasound exposure in the workplace?
OSHA 1910.95 covers audible-range noise (20 Hz–20 kHz). Sub-harmonic components from ultrasonic equipment that fall within audible range are covered. True ultrasonic-range exposures are addressed through the General Duty Clause and NIOSH guidance. Many ultrasonic machines generate audible sub-harmonics that exceed the 85 dBA action level.
What industries have significant occupational ultrasound exposure?
Automotive manufacturing (ultrasonic welding), electronics manufacturing (ultrasonic cleaning), medical device manufacturing, food processing (ultrasonic cutting), and industrial cleaning operations. Workers adjacent to ultrasonic welders and cleaners face sub-harmonic noise covered by OSHA 1910.95.
What NIOSH guidance applies to occupational ultrasound exposure?
NIOSH has published criteria documents recommending exposure limits for airborne ultrasound and audiometric monitoring for workers with sustained ultrasound exposure, recognizing that sub-harmonic components may fall within audible frequency ranges covered by OSHA 1910.95.

Audiometric Surveillance for Ultrasound-Exposed Workers

Soundtrace audiometric testing and professional supervisor review provides the hearing surveillance component for workers with combined audible-range and ultrasound exposure profiles.

Get a Free Quote
Matt Reinhold, COO & Co-Founder at Soundtrace

Matt Reinhold

COO & Co-Founder, Soundtrace

Matt Reinhold is the COO and Co-Founder of Soundtrace, where he drives strategy and operations to modernize occupational hearing conservation. With deep expertise in workplace safety technology, Matt stays at the forefront of regulatory developments, audiometric testing innovation, and noise exposure management — helping employers build smarter, more compliant hearing conservation programs.

Related Articles

Stay in the loop

Get compliance updates, product news, and practical tips delivered to your inbox.