How-To Guides
How-To Guides
March 17, 2023

Presbycusis Age Correction in OSHA Audiograms: The Appendix F Calculation Employers Can Use

Share article

OSHA 1910.95·Audiometric Testing·12 min read·Updated March 2026

Appendix F of OSHA 1910.95 contains a provision most safety managers have never used: an age correction calculation that allows employers to subtract the expected contribution of presbycusis — age-related hearing loss — from an apparent standard threshold shift before deciding whether an STS has occurred. The calculation is based on NIOSH-developed tables, is entirely optional, and when applied correctly can prevent false-positive STS determinations for older workers. But it can only be used for one purpose, and using it incorrectly creates compliance gaps with real consequences.

Soundtrace’s Professional Supervisor applies age correction consistently and appropriately as part of every audiogram review, with the correction decision documented per worker.

Optional
Age correction under Appendix F is not required — it is a permitted adjustment employers may choose to apply
STS only
Age correction may only be applied when determining whether an STS occurred — never for the OSHA 300 Log 25 dB HTL test
Consistent
Employers should apply or not apply age correction consistently across their program — inconsistency is itself a compliance gap
Why Age Correction Matters for Older Workers

A 58-year-old male worker with 10 dB of apparent threshold shift at 4000 Hz between his age-52 baseline and current audiogram may have 3–4 dB of that shift attributable to expected age-related hearing loss, not occupational noise. Without age correction, that worker appears to have an STS triggering notification, retraining, and potential 300 Log entry. With age correction, the adjusted shift may fall below the 10 dB STS threshold — no notification required, no 300 Log entry.

Age Correction Under OSHA 1910.95 Appendix F — Where It Can and Cannot Be Applied
Age correction is a one-purpose tool. It adjusts for expected presbycusis when determining whether an STS has occurred under 1910.95(g)(10). It cannot reduce the 25 dB HTL threshold for OSHA 300 Log recordability under 1904.10.
When to Apply (and Not Apply) Age Correction Under OSHA 1910.95 Appendix F ✓ CAN Apply Age Correction Determining whether an STS occurred Comparing annual audiogram to baseline to determine if 10 dB average shift at 2000/3000/4000 Hz occurred Regulatory cite: 1910.95(g)(10)(ii) and Appendix F Effect: May reduce or eliminate apparent STS for older workers ✗ CANNOT Apply Age Correction OSHA 300 Log 25 dB HTL test Determining whether total hearing level is 25 dB or more above audiometric zero for recordability Regulatory cite: 1904.10(b)(2)(ii) — no adjustment permitted Effect: Applying here is a recordkeeping violation

What Presbycusis Is and Why It Matters for Audiograms

Presbycusis is the gradual, symmetric, high-frequency hearing loss that occurs as a normal part of aging. It is caused by degeneration of cochlear hair cells, changes in the cochlear blood supply, and neuronal loss in the auditory pathway — processes that begin in the third decade of life and accelerate after age 60. Presbycusis preferentially affects high-frequency hearing and creates a characteristic audiometric pattern of gradually increasing thresholds at 2000, 3000, 4000, and 6000 Hz.

Because presbycusis affects the same frequencies as noise-induced hearing loss, the two conditions are audiometrically difficult to distinguish. A worker who has developed 20 dB of threshold elevation at 4000 Hz over 10 years may have acquired that loss from occupational noise, from natural aging, or from a combination. Without age correction, all of it counts toward an STS determination under OSHA 1910.95(g)(10).

The Appendix F Calculation Step by Step

OSHA Appendix F provides sex-specific tables of expected age-related threshold changes at each audiometric frequency. The correction procedure involves three steps:

Step 1: Find the worker’s age at the time the baseline audiogram was taken. Look up the age correction values for each frequency (1000–6000 Hz) from the appropriate Table F-1 (males) or F-2 (females).

Step 2: Find the worker’s age at the time of the most recent (annual) audiogram. Look up the age correction values for those same frequencies from the same table.

Step 3: Subtract the baseline-age correction values from the current-age correction values. The difference represents the expected age-related threshold change over the period between the two audiograms. Subtract this from the apparent threshold shift in the annual audiogram to get the age-corrected threshold shift.

If the age-corrected average shift at 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hz is less than 10 dB, no STS has occurred under the age-corrected analysis. If it is still 10 dB or more, the STS persists even after age correction.

Worked Example: Age Correction at 4000 Hz

A male worker had his baseline audiogram at age 27. His current annual audiogram is taken at age 32. At 4000 Hz, his baseline threshold was 5 dB HL; his current threshold is 25 dB HL. The apparent threshold shift is 20 dB.

From OSHA Table F-1 (males): the age correction value at 4000 Hz is 3 dB at age 27 and 5 dB at age 32. The difference is 2 dB — the expected aging contribution over the 5-year period. Subtracting 2 dB from the apparent 20 dB shift yields an age-corrected threshold shift of 18 dB at 4000 Hz. This still exceeds the 10 dB STS threshold at this frequency, so the STS determination is unchanged in this case. But for a worker with a 12 dB apparent shift at 4000 Hz and 3 dB of expected aging contribution, the age-corrected shift drops to 9 dB — below the STS threshold.

What Age Correction Cannot Be Used For

The most important limitation of age correction is that it cannot be applied to the OSHA 300 Log 25 dB hearing threshold level test under 1904.10. The recordability test requires evaluating the worker’s actual, unadjusted total hearing level at 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hz against the 25 dB above audiometric zero threshold. Age correction is expressly prohibited here by 1904.10(b)(2)(ii).

The most common age correction error

Employers and some third-party HCP vendors mistakenly apply age correction to the 300 Log recordability determination as well as the STS determination. This is a recordkeeping violation. An employer who uses age correction to conclude that a 300 Log entry is not required — when the worker’s unadjusted hearing level exceeds 25 dB above audiometric zero — has failed to make a required recordkeeping entry. The correction applies only to the STS test under 1910.95, not to the recordability test under 1904.10.

Program-Level Policy: The Consistency Requirement

OSHA does not require employers to apply age correction. It is entirely optional. But whatever decision an employer makes — to apply it or not apply it — must be applied consistently across the entire program. An employer who applies age correction for some workers but not others, or who applies it when it helps but not when it makes no difference, creates a compliance record that may be challenged during an inspection or litigation.

Best practice is to establish a written policy at the program level, document whether age correction is applied in each audiometric review, and have the Professional Supervisor confirm the application consistently. The decision is typically made during audiometric database setup and should be part of the written HCP documentation.


Frequently asked questions

What is age correction in OSHA audiograms?
Age correction under OSHA 1910.95 Appendix F is an optional adjustment that allows employers to subtract the expected contribution of age-related hearing loss (presbycusis) from an apparent threshold shift before determining whether a standard threshold shift has occurred. It uses NIOSH-developed sex-specific tables of expected threshold changes by age at each audiometric frequency. It may only be applied to the STS determination under 1910.95(g)(10) — not to the OSHA 300 Log 25 dB HTL recordability test.
Does age correction reduce OSHA 300 Log entries?
No. Age correction cannot be applied to the 300 Log hearing loss recordability test under 29 CFR 1904.10. That test requires evaluating the worker’s actual, unadjusted hearing level against the 25 dB above audiometric zero threshold. Applying age correction to the recordability determination is a recordkeeping violation regardless of whether the worker has an age-corrected STS.

Age Correction Applied Consistently by a Licensed Professional Supervisor

Soundtrace’s audiometric review applies Appendix F age correction consistently across all enrolled workers, with the correction decision documented per record — ensuring compliance and defensibility for both STS determinations and 300 Log entries.

Get a Free Quote