HomeBlogMotor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing: Occupational Hearing Loss OSHA Data
industries

Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing: Occupational Hearing Loss OSHA Data

Matt Reinhold, COO & Co-Founder at SoundtraceMatt ReinholdCOO & Co-Founder10 min readApril 8, 2026
OSHA Data·Auto Parts·10 min read·Updated April 2026

Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing (NAICS 3363) generates occupational noise exposures that require mandatory OSHA 1910.95 hearing conservation programs at most facilities. Motor vehicle parts manufacturing (NAICS 3363) is distinct from assembly (NAICS 3361-3362) and has different noise exposure profiles. Stamping press operations are among the loudest in all of manufact According to CDC/NIOSH, approximately 22 million U.S. workers are exposed to hazardous occupational noise annually, and auto parts workers are among those with significant hearing loss risk from primary production operations.

Soundtrace delivers in-house audiometric testing and noise monitoring for auto parts operations — ANSI S3.1-compliant, automated STS detection, and licensed audiologist Professional Supervisor review.

Noise Levels by Process: NAICS 3363

Equipment / ProcessTypical LevelTypical 8-hr TWAOSHA Status
Stamping press (mechanical)95–115 dBA92–105 dBAExceeds PEL — among loudest in manufacturing
Transfer press line100–115 dBA95–108 dBASignificantly exceeds PEL
Robotic welding cell85–100 dBA85–95 dBAAt or above action level
CNC machining center85–100 dBA85–95 dBAAt or above action level; coolant pump noise significant
Grinding and deburring90–105 dBA88–98 dBAAt or above PEL
Assembly line80–95 dBA82–92 dBAMonitor by station; air tool use increases TWA
Paint/coating booths75–85 dBA75–84 dBAExhaust fan noise may approach action level
Key noise exposure facts for auto parts

Motor vehicle parts manufacturing (NAICS 3363) is distinct from assembly (NAICS 3361-3362) and has different noise exposure profiles. Stamping press operations are among the loudest in all of manufacturing, with mechanical press impact noise exceeding the PEL by 5–25 dB. OSHA ITA data shows motor vehicle parts suppliers as a consistently high-citation sector for 1910.95 violations, particularly at stamping and transfer press facilities.

OSHA 1910.95 Compliance Requirements

All auto parts workers at or above the 85 dBA action level must be enrolled in the full six-element OSHA 1910.95 hearing conservation program: noise monitoring, audiometric testing, hearing protection, training, recordkeeping, and access to information. Workers above the 90 dBA PEL also require a documented engineering controls assessment. See: audiometric testing for employers: complete guide.

OSHA Citation Patterns: NAICS 3363

Violation TypeFrequencyTypical Penalty Range
Late or missing baseline audiograms (1910.95(g)(5))Very high$2,000–$7,000
Annual audiogram schedule failures (1910.95(g)(6))High$2,000–$7,000
No noise monitoring — assumed below action level without data (1910.95(d))High$1,000–$5,000
No engineering controls assessment above PEL (1910.95(b)(1))Moderate$3,000–$9,000
Inadequate HPD for actual exposure levels (1910.95(i))Moderate$2,000–$6,000
Missing or incomplete training records (1910.95(k))High$1,000–$4,000

Workers’ Compensation Exposure

Stamping press operators develop occupational NIHL rapidly relative to other manufacturing workers due to the extreme peak noise levels. Workers who spend 20+ years adjacent to stamping lines routinely develop significant bilateral high-frequency hearing loss that generates substantial WC claims. The combination of high noise levels and long shift durations makes comprehensive audiometric surveillance from hire essential.

The primary defense tools: a pre-employment baseline audiogram establishing the worker's hearing at hire, continuous annual audiometric records with no gaps, noise monitoring documentation by job classification, and HPD provision and fit testing records. Without complete documentation, apportionment of hearing loss between employers or between occupational and non-occupational causes cannot be performed. See: workers’ compensation for occupational hearing loss.

Industry-Specific Considerations

Many automotive parts suppliers operate as Tier 1 or Tier 2 suppliers to OEMs and may face customer-driven audit requirements for OSHA compliance in addition to regulatory requirements. A documented, auditable HCP with complete records is increasingly a supplier qualification requirement.

In-house audiometric testing for auto parts operations

Soundtrace delivers OSHA-compliant audiometric testing and noise monitoring for auto parts employers — automated STS detection, 30-year cloud retention, and licensed audiologist supervision.

Get a Free Quote Book a demo →

Matt Reinhold, COO & Co-Founder at Soundtrace

Matt Reinhold

COO & Co-Founder, Soundtrace

Matt Reinhold is the COO and Co-Founder of Soundtrace, where he drives strategy and operations to modernize occupational hearing conservation. With deep expertise in workplace safety technology, Matt stays at the forefront of regulatory developments, audiometric testing innovation, and noise exposure management — helping employers build smarter, more compliant hearing conservation programs.

Related Articles

Stay in the loop

Get compliance updates, product news, and practical tips delivered to your inbox.