HomeBlogAircraft & Aerospace Manufacturing: Occupational Hearing Loss OSHA Data
industries

Aircraft & Aerospace Manufacturing: Occupational Hearing Loss OSHA Data

Matt Reinhold, COO & Co-Founder at SoundtraceMatt ReinholdCOO & Co-Founder10 min readApril 8, 2026
OSHA Data·Aerospace·10 min read·Updated April 2026

Aircraft & Aerospace Manufacturing (NAICS 3364) generates occupational noise exposures that require mandatory OSHA 1910.95 hearing conservation programs at most facilities. Aircraft and aerospace manufacturing (NAICS 3364) is subject to OSHA 1910.95 for general industry operations. Engine test facilities and riveting operations are the highest-exposure environments. OSHA According to CDC/NIOSH, approximately 22 million U.S. workers are exposed to hazardous occupational noise annually, and aerospace workers are among those with significant hearing loss risk from primary production operations.

Soundtrace delivers in-house audiometric testing and noise monitoring for aerospace operations — ANSI S3.1-compliant, automated STS detection, and licensed audiologist Professional Supervisor review.

Noise Levels by Process: NAICS 3364

Equipment / ProcessTypical LevelTypical 8-hr TWAOSHA Status
Engine test cell110–140 dBA100–115 dBAFar exceeds PEL — double HPD typically required
Riveting (pneumatic)100–110 dBA95–105 dBASignificantly exceeds PEL
Metal forming / stamping90–105 dBA88–98 dBAAt or above PEL
Surface grinding / finishing90–100 dBA88–96 dBAAt or above PEL
Composite cutting / routing90–100 dBA88–96 dBAAt or above action level; many exceed PEL
General assembly80–90 dBA80–88 dBAMonitor before assuming below AL
Clean-room / electronics60–75 dBA<80 dBATypically below action level
Key noise exposure facts for aerospace

Aircraft and aerospace manufacturing (NAICS 3364) is subject to OSHA 1910.95 for general industry operations. Engine test facilities and riveting operations are the highest-exposure environments. OSHA enforcement in aerospace has historically focused on engine test cell noise exposure controls and HPD adequacy for riveting operations. Defense contractors are subject to the same 1910.95 requirements as commercial manufacturers.

OSHA 1910.95 Compliance Requirements

All aerospace workers at or above the 85 dBA action level must be enrolled in the full six-element OSHA 1910.95 hearing conservation program: noise monitoring, audiometric testing, hearing protection, training, recordkeeping, and access to information. Workers above the 90 dBA PEL also require a documented engineering controls assessment. See: audiometric testing for employers: complete guide.

OSHA Citation Patterns: NAICS 3364

Violation TypeFrequencyTypical Penalty Range
Late or missing baseline audiograms (1910.95(g)(5))Very high$2,000–$7,000
Annual audiogram schedule failures (1910.95(g)(6))High$2,000–$7,000
No noise monitoring — assumed below action level without data (1910.95(d))High$1,000–$5,000
No engineering controls assessment above PEL (1910.95(b)(1))Moderate$3,000–$9,000
Inadequate HPD for actual exposure levels (1910.95(i))Moderate$2,000–$6,000
Missing or incomplete training records (1910.95(k))High$1,000–$4,000

Workers’ Compensation Exposure

Aerospace workers, particularly those in engine test and riveting roles, develop significant occupational NIHL that generates WC claims. The high CPC values for aerospace-related audiometric testing keywords reflect that aerospace EHS managers are actively searching for compliance solutions.

The primary defense tools: a pre-employment baseline audiogram establishing the worker's hearing at hire, continuous annual audiometric records with no gaps, noise monitoring documentation by job classification, and HPD provision and fit testing records. Without complete documentation, apportionment of hearing loss between employers or between occupational and non-occupational causes cannot be performed. See: workers’ compensation for occupational hearing loss.

Industry-Specific Considerations

Engine test cell personnel require hearing conservation programs that specifically address exposures far above the PEL. Dual HPD is typically required. The audiometric program must confirm that HPD is providing adequate protection by tracking threshold trends in test cell workers over time.

In-house audiometric testing for aerospace operations

Soundtrace delivers OSHA-compliant audiometric testing and noise monitoring for aerospace employers — automated STS detection, 30-year cloud retention, and licensed audiologist supervision.

Get a Free Quote Book a demo →

Matt Reinhold, COO & Co-Founder at Soundtrace

Matt Reinhold

COO & Co-Founder, Soundtrace

Matt Reinhold is the COO and Co-Founder of Soundtrace, where he drives strategy and operations to modernize occupational hearing conservation. With deep expertise in workplace safety technology, Matt stays at the forefront of regulatory developments, audiometric testing innovation, and noise exposure management — helping employers build smarter, more compliant hearing conservation programs.

Related Articles

Stay in the loop

Get compliance updates, product news, and practical tips delivered to your inbox.