HomeBlogAir Transportation Has the Highest Per-Company Hearing Loss Rate in America. Here's Why.
industries

Air Transportation Has the Highest Per-Company Hearing Loss Rate in America. Here's Why.

Jeff Wilson, CEO & Founder at SoundtraceJeff WilsonCEO & Founder11 min readMarch 1, 2026
Industry Deep Dive·11 min read·Updated March 2026

101.8 hearing loss cases per company. Across 39 Air Transportation companies in nine years of OSHA data, the average employer recorded nearly 102 hearing loss cases — nearly seven times the next-highest industry. And the trend line is unlike anything else in the dataset: a dramatic 75% decline from 2016 to 2023, followed by a 2024 uptick that raises urgent questions.

Soundtrace analyzed nine years of OSHA ITA hearing loss data across 21,120 U.S. establishments. Air Transportation’s extreme per-company case concentration, its unique declining trend, and its 2024 reversal make it one of the most analytically interesting industries in the dataset. Part of our ongoing industry-by-industry deep dive series.

3,969
Total HL cases, 2016–2024
39
Companies in the dataset
101.8
Cases per company — highest of any industry
−75%
Decline from 2016 peak to 2023 low

The Most Concentrated Industry in the Dataset

Every other major industry in the Soundtrace dataset is built from hundreds or thousands of reporting companies. Food & Beverage: 1,172. Transportation Equipment: 811. Air Transportation: 39. The entire industry’s nine-year hearing loss profile is generated by fewer than 40 employers. The two largest companies alone account for roughly 80% of all industry cases.

101.8
Average hearing loss cases per company
across 39 Air Transportation employers
Compare: Food & Beverage 13.3  •  Transportation Equipment 14.7
The Oligopoly Effect

When an industry has 39 companies producing nearly 4,000 hearing loss cases, the conversation is not about industry norms. It is about specific enterprises, specific programs, and specific leadership decisions.

The Noise Profile: What Airline Workers Actually Face

100–140 dBA
Jet Engine at Ramp Distance
At 50 feet during idle to taxi thrust. Peaks during engine start and reverse thrust.
88–100 dBA
Ground Support Equipment
Aircraft tugs, belt loaders, ground power units, and baggage carts running simultaneously.
95–112 dBA
Aircraft Maintenance
Rivet guns, grinders, engine test cells, and hydraulic systems. Enclosed hangar spaces amplify noise.
88–96 dBA
Cargo Operations
Forklift operations, conveyor systems, and aircraft cargo doors in proximity to ramp equipment.
90–105 dBA
Pushback & Taxiway Ops
Tug engine noise plus jet blast from the aircraft being pushed. Headset use compounds compliance challenges.
85–110 dBA
Engine Test Cells & Runup
The highest-intensity noise environment in aviation maintenance. Extreme baseline exposure levels.
The Communications Compliance Trap

Ramp workers frequently remove hearing protection to communicate via radio, then replace it inconsistently. Communication-compatible hearing protection — devices that attenuate hazardous noise while passing speech-range frequencies — is a technical requirement, not just a preference, in operations where communication failures have safety consequences beyond hearing loss.

The Remarkable Nine-Year Decline — and Why It Happened

From a peak of approximately 950 cases in 2016, Air Transportation declined every single year through 2023, reaching a low of roughly 175 cases — an 82% reduction. This decline began years before COVID and continued through the pandemic.

2016
~950 ▲ peak
2017
~780
2018
~665
2019
~550
2020
~360 ▼ COVID + decline
2021
~285
2022
~265
2023
~175 ▼ dataset low
2024
~285+ proj. ▲ reversal
Confirmed cases
Projected (partial 2024)
COVID + continued decline

The most likely drivers of the sustained decline: fleet modernization toward quieter engine technology, union-driven hearing protection compliance programs at major carriers, ramp process redesigns reducing worker dwell time in extreme noise zones, and gate electrification eliminating GPU noise.

What This Decline Actually Proves

Air Transportation’s sustained nine-year decline is one of the most compelling real-world demonstrations that occupational hearing loss is genuinely preventable when an industry makes consistent, multi-pronged investments in engineering controls and program quality. The question for every other high-volume industry is why their trend lines don’t look the same.

The 2024 Uptick: Cause for Concern?

After seven consecutive years of decline, 2024 partial-year data shows Air Transportation reversing course. With approximately 285 cases through August 2024, the annualized projection suggests the full year may come in near or above 400 cases — roughly double the 2023 low of 175. The honest answer is it is too early to determine whether this represents a genuine reversal or a statistical artifact of the small-sample nature of this dataset. Post-pandemic workforce surges, deferred testing backlogs, and ITA reporting population shifts are all plausible explanations.

What a Strong Aviation Hearing Conservation Program Requires

  • Communication-compatible hearing protection is non-negotiable. Standard foam earplugs are not an acceptable solution for ramp workers who must communicate during high-noise operations. The behavioral barrier that causes workers to remove HPDs to communicate is the primary compliance failure point in aviation.
  • Dynamic noise exposure monitoring for variable ramp positions. Standard area monitoring misses the exposure variability of ramp workers who move between gate positions, baggage areas, and ground equipment staging throughout a shift.
  • Baseline audiogram discipline for rapid-hire ramp expansions. Post-pandemic hiring surges at major carriers created enrollment management challenges. Any worker in a noise-hazardous role without a compliant baseline audiogram is both a compliance and liability exposure.
  • Longitudinal records for long-tenure mechanics. Aircraft mechanics often spend entire 30+ year careers in noise-hazardous environments. Employer-controlled, cloud-based systems that do not depend on vendor continuity are the only reliable architecture for multi-decade records.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does Air Transportation have a 101.8 cases-per-company average?

Air Transportation has only 39 companies in the dataset but 3,969 total cases over nine years. The industry is structurally concentrated: a small number of large carriers each employ tens of thousands of workers exposed to jet engine and ground equipment noise. The two largest companies alone account for roughly 80% of all industry cases.

Why have Air Transportation hearing loss cases declined so dramatically?

The most likely drivers: fleet modernization toward quieter engine technology, union-driven hearing protection compliance programs, ramp process redesigns reducing dwell time in extreme noise zones, and gate electrification programs eliminating GPU noise. The sustained multi-year decline is one of the strongest demonstrations in the dataset that occupational hearing loss is genuinely preventable.

Does OSHA 1910.95 apply to airline workers?

Yes. OSHA 29 CFR 1910.95 applies to all Air Transportation employers where workers are exposed at or above 85 dBA TWA. This covers ramp agents, aircraft mechanics, ground equipment operators, and cargo handlers. Flight crew have separate requirements under FAA regulations.

Is your airline or MRO in this dataset?

Soundtrace has nine years of OSHA ITA hearing loss data across 39 Air Transportation companies. We can tell you where your operation ranks — and what the 75% decline leaders did differently.

Contact us to find out
Data Notes: Analysis based on OSHA ITA data, 2016–August 2024. The 39-company universe means aggregate figures are sensitive to reporting population changes at individual companies. The 2024 data covers January–August only; full-year figures will be updated when complete data is available.
Jeff Wilson, CEO & Founder at Soundtrace

Jeff Wilson

CEO & Founder, Soundtrace

Jeff Wilson is the CEO and Founder of Soundtrace. He started the company after seeing firsthand how outdated and fragmented hearing conservation was across industries. Jeff brings a hands-on approach to building technology that makes OSHA compliance simpler and hearing protection more effective for the employers and workers who need it most.

Related Articles

Stay in the loop

Get compliance updates, product news, and practical tips delivered to your inbox.