HomeBlogMobile Audiometry Van vs In-House Testing: Complete Employer Comparison
audiometry

Mobile Audiometry Van vs In-House Testing: Complete Employer Comparison

Matt Reinhold, COO & Co-Founder at SoundtraceMatt ReinholdCOO & Co-Founder10 min readApril 8, 2026
Audiometry·10 min read·Updated April 2026

Both mobile audiometry vans and in-house audiometric testing can satisfy OSHA 1910.95 when properly implemented. The decision comes down to compliance reliability, record ownership, and total cost. According to CDC/NIOSH, approximately 22 million U.S. workers face hazardous occupational noise annually.

Head-to-Head Comparison

FactorMobile Audiometry VanIn-House Testing
Scheduling flexibilityFixed visit dates; gaps between visits create deadline riskOn-demand; any day, any shift
New hire baseline timingNext scheduled visit may miss 6-month windowDays after hire; zero gap risk
Multi-shift coverageTypically day shift onlyAll shifts equal access
Record custodyVendor system; access uncertain if vendor relationship endsEmployer-controlled cloud; always accessible
STS detection timingWhen PS reviews batch (weeks or months later)At point of testing; PS notified same day
Ambient noise documentationPer session (shared across all workers tested that day)Per individual audiogram
Worker production lossHigh — travel to van, wait, test, return (30-60 min)Low — on-site, minimal queue
Best forSmall employer (<50 workers); no prior compliance gaps50+ workers; multi-shift; compliance history; WC exposure

The Record Ownership Question

Both approaches can produce compliant audiograms. Only one guarantees you own and can access the records independently of a vendor relationship. A WC claim filed in 2040 for a worker employed 2010-2025 requires records from the full employment period. If your 2015 mobile van vendor closed in 2018, those records may be unrecoverable. See: why mobile van audiometric records are lost.

When to Switch from Mobile Van to In-House

Inflection points that make in-house the right call: 100+ enrolled workers, multi-shift operations, prior OSHA citations for missed audiogram deadlines, vendor contract concerns about record access, or repeated STS detection delays. The compliance cost of continuing a failing mobile van program typically exceeds the transition cost within 18-24 months.

OSHA-compliant hearing conservation

Soundtrace delivers in-house audiometric testing, noise monitoring, and 30-year cloud records supervised by a licensed audiologist.

Get a Free Quote
Matt Reinhold, COO & Co-Founder at Soundtrace

Matt Reinhold

COO & Co-Founder, Soundtrace

Matt Reinhold is the COO and Co-Founder of Soundtrace, where he drives strategy and operations to modernize occupational hearing conservation. With deep expertise in workplace safety technology, Matt stays at the forefront of regulatory developments, audiometric testing innovation, and noise exposure management — helping employers build smarter, more compliant hearing conservation programs.

Related Articles

Stay in the loop

Get compliance updates, product news, and practical tips delivered to your inbox.