Across manufacturing, logistics, energy, aviation, and industrial services, more vendors are embedding full time employees inside customer facilities. These workers often perform the same tasks, use the same equipment, and face the same noise hazards as the host employer’s workforce. Yet when OSHA’s Hearing Conservation Program (HCP) applies, the responsibility is not always obvious.
The short answer is simple:
This structure comes from OSHA’s multi employer worksite policy and it shapes how citations are issued during inspections.
OSHA considers situations involving multiple employers under its Multi Employer Citation Policy (CPL 02 00 124). Although widely used in construction, OSHA makes clear that this policy applies to general industry as well.
In any environment where employees of different employers are working side by side, OSHA places responsibility into two categories.
This is the company listed on the worker’s W 2.
The vendor is responsible for maintaining the complete Hearing Conservation Program required by 29 CFR 1910.95. This includes:
OSHA recommends, but does not require, earplug fit testing. The agency highlights this in the OSHA Technical Manual Section III Chapter 5, explaining that fit testing can verify the actual attenuation workers receive. Many employers use fit testing because it reduces the likelihood of STS cases.
OSHA is explicit about the vendor’s obligation:
“Each employer is responsible for their own employees, regardless of whose workplace they are in.”
Relevant external sources
The host employer controls the facility and the physical environment where the vendor’s employees work.
Responsibilities include:
If hazardous noise exists in the facility and the host employer does not communicate or control those conditions, OSHA can issue citations.
When a Standard Threshold Shift occurs or a hearing related injury is recorded, OSHA may issue citations to one or both employers.
The Vendor may be cited for failure to:
The Host Employer may be cited for failure to:
Shared citations are common when both employers contributed to the conditions.
If you need the simplest possible explanation:
A maintenance services vendor provides 20 technicians who work full time inside a large manufacturing plant. The plant operates stamping presses, conveyors, and grinders that often produce noise levels between 88 and 96 dBA. The vendor’s technicians work throughout the facility, often side by side with the host employer’s permanent employees.
The vendor must:
If OSHA found that the vendor failed to provide audiograms or did not enroll employees despite known exposures, the vendor would be cited.
The host employer must:
If an OSHA inspection followed an STS in this example, both employers could face citations. The vendor may be cited for gaps in its HCP and the host employer may be cited for creating or failing to control the noise hazard.
This example illustrates how multi employer responsibilities function in real facilities.
Soundtrace helps both vendors and host employers maintain compliance by offering:
A complete, OSHA aligned Hearing Conservation Program that includes:
Improved visibility and shared accountability through:
Vendors gain a turnkey HCP. Hosts strengthen their safety posture and reduce risk.
No. OSHA assigns responsibility for audiometric testing to the vendor because the vendor is the employing employer.
No. Fit testing is recommended by OSHA and NIOSH as a best practice but remains optional. Employers use it to ensure proper attenuation and to reduce STS cases.
No. Even if the host employer offers PPE, the vendor still owns the HCP and must ensure its employees receive training and proper protection.
OSHA may cite the vendor for failing to assess noise exposure. The host employer may also be cited if it prevented access or failed to communicate known hazards.
Yes. The host employer must identify and communicate hazard areas, especially where exposures exceed 90 dBA or where hearing protection is required.
Yes. Shared liability is common. OSHA often issues citations to both employers when both contributed to unsafe conditions.
Yes. The vendor must monitor exposure during workplace changes and adjust enrollment accordingly.
Yes. The staffing agency is the employing employer and must provide the full HCP.
Yes, but only if the data is reliable, current, and representative of vendor work activities.
Typical documentation includes: HCP status reports, audiogram completion logs, STS follow up records, training completion, and proof of hearing protection provision.
Get fast pricing tailored to your workforce. Submit the quick form and we’ll handle the rest.
.png)

.png)
Join other EHS & Safety teams on simplifying their hearing conservation program.